Abstract
This study carries out an exegetical-theological analysis of Gen 12:1-9 through the canonical approach, highlighting the final form of the pericope as the locus of revelation and theological meaning. The canonical approach studies biblical passages within their canonical setting, taking into consideration the nature of their assigned authority. The study critiques the limitations of historical-critical approaches and proposes the canonical approach as a complementary hermeneutic that underscores theological coherence, intertextual resonance, and ecclesial relevance. The article argues that when Gen 12:1-9 is read from a canonical perspective, it manifests a coherent theological trajectory that links the Abrahamic promises to the wider scriptural narrative. Genesis 12:1-9 (the Abrahamic covenant promises; cf. Gen 12:1-3) is read as a theological hinge between divine judgment (Gen 11) and the universal blessing theme, underscoring key theological themes—progeny, land, blessing, election and universalism—as integral to the Abrahamic covenant narrative. The research, through canonical criticism, reaffirms the theological unity of the Old Testament and provides a model for faith-oriented exegesis that engages both the biblical text and its reception within the community of faith
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
