“Israel’s” Only Son? The complexity of Benjaminite identity between Judah and Joseph


Several studies in recent years have sought to articulate the significance of the tribe of Benjamin for historical and literary studies of the Hebrew Bible. This paper suggests that the received text of Genesis 35–50 both reflects and illumines the complexities of Israelite identity in the pre-exilic, Babylonian, and Persian periods. The fact that Benjamin is the only son born to “Israel” (other sons are born to “Jacob”) points to Israel’s origins in the land that came to be called “Benjaminite.” Between Josephites to the north and Judahites to the south, Benjaminites preserved a unique identity within the polities of Israel, Judah, Babylonian Yehud, and Persian Yehud. In Genesis 35 and 42–45 in particular, the silent character Benjamin finds himself in the middle of a tug-of-war between his brothers, particularly his full-brother Joseph and his half-brother Judah. The conciliatory message of the narrative of Genesis 35–50 for later communities comes into sharper focus when we see the compromise between tribal identities embedded in the text.




Gary N. Knoppers and Bernard Levinson, eds., The Pentateuch as Torah: New Models for Understanding Its Promulgation and Acceptance (Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 2007).

David Glatt-Gilad, “Chronicles as Consensus Literature,” in What Was Authoritative for Chronicles? (ed. Ehud Ben Zvi and Diana Edelman; Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 2011), 67–75.

(Author, 2016a)

(Author, 2016b): 16-29.

Yigal Levin, “Joseph, Judah and the ‘Benjamin Conundrum,’” ZAW 116 (2004): 223–41.

Joseph Blenkinsopp, “Benjamin Traditions Read in the Early Persian Period,” in Judah and the Judeans in the Persian Period, ed. Oded Lipschits and Manfred Oeming (Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 2006), 629–45.

Philip R. Davies, “The Trouble With Benjamin,” in Reflection and Refraction: Studies in Biblical Historiography in Honour of A. Graeme Auld, ed. Robert Rezetko et al., VTSup 113 (Leiden: Brill, 2007), 93–111.

Nadav Na’aman, “Saul, Benjamin and the Emergence of ‘Biblical Israel’ (Parts 1 & 2),” ZAW 121 (2009): 211–24, 335–49.

Daniel E. Fleming, The Legacy of Israel in Judah’s Bible: History, Politics, and the Reinscribing of Tradition (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012).

Louis C. Jonker, “Of Jebus, Jerusalem and Benjamin: The Chronicler’s Sondergut in 1 Chronicles 21 Against the Background of the Late Persian Era in Yehud,” in Chronicling the Chronicler: The Book of Chronicles and Early Second Temple Historiography, ed. Tyler F. Williams and Paul S. Evans (Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 2013), 81–102.

Avraham Faust, “Settlement Patterns and State Formation in Southern Samaria and the Archaeology of (a) Saul,” in Saul in Story and Tradition (ed. Carl S. Ehrlich and Marsha C. White; FAT 47; Tübingen: Mohr-Siebeck, 2006), 14–38.

Scott M. Langston, Cultic Sites in the Tribe of Benjamin: Benjaminite Prominence in the Religion of Israel (New York: Peter Lang Publishing, 1998).

Gary N. Knoppers, “Israel’s First King and ‘The Kingdom of YHWH in the Hands of the Sons of David’: The Place of the Saulide Monarchy in the Chronicler’s Historiography” in Saul in Story and Tradition (ed. Carl S. Ehrlich and Marsha C. White; FAT 47; Tübingen: Mohr-Siebeck, 2006), 187–213.

Siegfried Kreuzer, “Saul—Not Always—at War: A New Perspective on the Rise of Kingship in Israel” in Saul in Story and Tradition (ed. Carl S. Ehrlich and Marsha C. White; FAT 47; Tübingen: Mohr-Siebeck, 2006), 39–58.

Yairah Amit, “The Delicate Balance in the Image of Saul and Its Place in the Deuteronomistic History,” in Saul in Story and Tradition (ed. Carl S. Ehrlich and Marsha C. White; FAT 47; Tübingen: Mohr-Siebeck, 2006), 71–79.

Klaus-Dietrich Schunck, Benjamin: Untersuchungen zur Entstehung und Geschichte eines israelitischen Stammes (BZAW 86; Berlin: Alfred Töpelmann, 1963).

Klaus-Dietrich Schunck, “Benjamin,” translated by Phillip R. Callaway, in David Noel Freedman, ed., Anchor Bible Dictionary (New York: Doubleday, 1992), I.671–73.

Gary N. Knoppers, 1 Chronicles 1–9 (Anchor Bible Commentary; New York: Doubleday, 2004).

Ernst A. Knauf, “Bethel: The Israelite Impact on Judean Language and Literature,” in Judah and the Judeans in the Persian Period (ed. Oded Lipschits and Manfred Oeming; Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 2006), 291–349.

Oded Lipschits, The Fall and Rise of Jerusalem: Judah Under Babylonian Rule (Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 2005).

Hans M. Barstad, The Myth of the Empty Land: A Study in the History and Archaeology of Judah During the “Exilic” Period (Oslo: Scandinavian University Press, 1996).

Oded Lipschits, “The History of the Benjamin Region under Babylonian Rule,” Tel Aviv 26 (1999): 155–90.

Gary E. Schnittjer, The Torah Story: An Apprenticeship on the Pentateuch (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2006).

Shaye J. D. Cohen, The Beginnings of Jewishness: Boundaries, Varieties, Uncertainties (Berkeley, CA; University of California Press,1999.

Louis C. Jonker, “Engaging with Different Contexts: A Survey of the Various Levels of Identity Negotiation in Chronicles,” in Texts, Contexts and Readings in Postexilic Literature (ed. Louis C. Jonker; FAT 53; Tübingen: Mohr-Siebeck, 2011), 63–93.

Jonker, Defining All-Israel in Chronicles: Multi-levelled Identity Negotiation in Late Persian-Period Yehud (FAT 106; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2016).

Benyamim Tsedaka, ed. and trans., The Israelite Samaritan Version of the Torah: First English Translation Compared with the Masoretic Version (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2013).

Iain Provan, Discovering Genesis: Content, Interpretation, Reception (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2015).

Walter Brueggemann, Genesis (Interpretation Series; Atlanta: John Knox Press, 1982).

Ephraim A. Speiser, Genesis: Introduction, Translation and Notes (Anchor Bible; Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1964).

Claus Westermann, Genesis (trans. David E. Green; London: T&T Clark, 1987).

Victor P. Hamilton, The Book of Genesis: Chapters 18–50 (NICOT; Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1995).

Gordon Wenham, Genesis 16–50 (WBC; Dallas: Word Books, 1994).

Robert E. Longacre, Joseph—A Story of Divine Providence: A Text and Text-linguistic Analysis of Genesis 37 and 39–48 (Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns, 1989).

Roy L. Heller, Narrative Structure and Discourse Constellations: An Analysis of Clause Function in Biblical Hebrew Prose (HSS 55; Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns, 2004).

Donald B. Redford, A Study of the Biblical Story of Joseph (Genesis 37–50) (VTSupp 20; Leiden: Brill, 1970).

Robert G. Boling, Judges: A New Translation with Notes and Commentary (Anchor Bible; Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1975).

Trent C. Butler, Judges (WBC; Nashville: Thomas Nelson, 2009).

Barry G. Webb, The Book of Judges (NICOT; Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2012).

Marsha C. White, “Saul and Jonathan in 1 Samuel 1 and 14,” in Saul in Story and Tradition (ed. Carl S. Ehrlich and Marsha C. White; FAT 47; Tübingen: Mohr-Siebeck, 2006), 119–138.

Gregory Mobley, “Glimpses of the Heroic Saul,” in Saul in Story and Tradition (ed. Carl S. Ehrlich and Marsha C. White; FAT 47; Tübingen: Mohr-Siebeck, 2006), 80–87.

Judah Goldin, “The Youngest Son or Where Does Genesis 38 Belong,” JBL 96.1 (1977): 27–44.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).