Keywords
Exclusivity
Ezra-Nehemiah
Theology of Reconstruction.
How to Cite
Abstract
The Judeans of the Late Persian era could not interpret the “empty land” myth in any other way other than inclusively, including Ezra-Nehemiah, so argues Ehud Ben Zvi. This transpires from his social memory analysis of thepentateuchal, Deuteronomistic history and prophetic literature. The logic in his argument is so persuasive that it compels a review of one’s stance on the exclusivity of Ezra-Nehemiah. After some more engagement with Ezra-Nehemiah this paper remains convinced that Ezra-Nehemiah is exclusive and the “empty land’ myth is applied in an exclusive perspective. Of great concern however, is the fact that Ben Zvi’s argument comes at a time when Africans are engaged in a quest for a biblical paradigm for a theology of reconstruction that is being contemplated. Particularly of concern is that some suggest Nehemiah as a paradigm for a theology of reconstruction in Africa just as Moses and the Exodus were for the theology of liberation. For historical reasons this paper rejects Nehemiah as a biblical paradigm for a theology of reconstruction in Africa. This paper engages with Ben Zvi’s paper titled “Total Exile, Empty Land and the General Intellectual Discourse in Yehud” against this background.
References
Author. 2013.
Author. 2015.
Author. Forthcoming.
Ben-Zvi, Ehud. 2010. Total Exile, Empty Land and the General Intellectual Discourse in The Concept of Exile in Ancient Israel and its Historical Contexts (eds. Ehud Ben Zvi & Christoph Levin). Piscataway, Gorgias Press, pp. 155-168.
Ben Zvi, Ehud. 2011. On Social Memory and Identity Formation in Late Persian Yehud in Texts, Contexts and Readings in Postexilic Literature (Ed. Louis C Jonker), Tübingen: Mohr-Siebeck, pp. 95-148.
Ben-Zvi, Ehud. Remembering the Prophets through the Reading and Rereading of a Collection of Prophetic Books in Yehud: Methodological Considerations and Explorations (Eds. Ben-Zvi, E. & Levin) in Remembering and Forgetting in Early Second Temple Judah, Tübingen: Mohr-Siebeck pp.17-44.
Ben Zvi, Ehud. 2017. Chronicles and social memory, Studia Theologica-Nordic Journal of Theology, pp. 1-22. DOI: 10.1080/0039338X.2017.1308718
Cezula, Ntozakhe S. 2015. “De-Ideologizing Ezra-Nehemiah: Challenging Discriminatory Ideologies†in Restorative Readings: The Old Testament, Ethics, and Human Dignity, eds. L. Juliana Claassens & Bruce Birch (Eugen, OR: Wipf & Stock), pp. 117-138.
Farisani, Elelwani B. 2002. The Use of Ezra-Nehemiah in a Quest for a Theology of Renewal, Transformation, and Reconstruction in the (South) African Context. (PhD diss., University of KwaZulu-Natal).
Grabbe, Lester L. 1998. Ezra-Nehemiah. London: Routledge.
Groenewald, Evert P. 1947. Apartheid en Voogdyskap in die Lig van die Heilige Skrif in Regverdige Rasse-Apartheid (eds. G. Cronjé, Wm Nicol; E P Groenewald). Christen-Studentevereniging Boekhandel: Stellenbosch, pp. 40–67.
Japhet, Sara.1997. The Ideology of the Book of Chronicles and its Place in Biblical Thought. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Johnson Richard W. 2004. South Africa: The First Man, the Last Nation. Cape Town: Jonathan Ball Publishers.
Jonker, Louis. 2007. “The Exile as Sabbath Rest: The Chronicler’s Interpretation of the Exile†in Old Testament Essays 20/3, 703-719.
Jonker, Louis C. 2013. 1 and 2 Chronicles. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic Press.
Karamaga, André. 1997. A Theology of Reconstruction in Democracy and Development in Africa: The role of the Churches, ed. JNK Mugambi (Nairobi: All Africa Conference of Churches), 190-191.
Loba-Mkole, Jean-Claude. 2012. Bible Translation and Reconstruction Hermeneutics in Theologies of Liberation and Reconstruction, eds. Isaac MT Mwase & Eunice K Kamaara (Nairobi: Acton Publishers), 146-170
Meyer, Esias. 2014. “Returning to an Empty Land: Revisiting My Old Argument about Jubilee.†Old Testament Essays 27/2, pp. 502-519.
Mosala, Itumeleng J. 1989. Biblical Hermeneutics and Black Theology in South Africa. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans.
Mtshiselwa, Ndikho. Forthcoming. To Whom Belongs the Land? Leviticus 25 in an African Liberationist Reading.
Mugambi, Jesse NK. 1995. From Liberation to Reconstruction: African Christian Theology after the Cold War. Nairobi: East African Educational Publishers.
Social Reconstruction of Africa: The Role of Churches, in The Church and Reconstruction of Africa: Theological Considerations (Nairobi: All Africa Conference of Churches), pp. 1-25.
Foreword, in Theology of Reconstruction: Exploratory Essays (eds. MN Getui & EA Obeng); Nairobi: Acton, pp. i-iv.
Christian Theology and Social Reconstruction. Nairobi: Acton.
Nuremberg Trial Proceedings, Volume 12. One Hundred and Eleventh Day to the One Hundred and Nineteenth Day. Online: http://www.loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/pdf/NT_ Vol-XII.pdf. Accessed on 20/09/2013.
Sparks, James T. 2008. The Chronicler’s Genealogies: Towards an understanding of 1 Chronicles 1-9. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature.
Stipp, Hermann-Josef. 2010. “The Concept of the Empty Land in Jeremiah 37-43†in The Concept of Exile in Ancient Israel and its Historical Contexts (eds. Ehud Ben Zvi & Christoph Levin). Piscataway, Gorgias Press, pp. 103-154.
Thompson, JA. 1994. 1 & 2 Chronicles (New American Commentary, v 9). Nashville: Broadman & Holman.
Villa-Vicencio, Charles. 1992. A Theology of Reconstruction: Nation-building and Human Rights (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Weanzana, Nupanga. 2006. Ezra in Africa Bible Commentary, (Ed. T Adeyemo). Nairobi: World Alive Publishers, pp. 531–42.
Williamson, Hugh GM. 1982. 1 and 2 Chronicles (New Century Bible Commentary) London: Marshall Morgan & Scott.
Yee, Gale A. 1995. The Author/Text/Reader and Power: Suggestions for a Critical Framework for Biblical Studies in Reading from this Place, Volume 1: Social Location and Biblical Interpretation in the United States (Eds. Fernando F. Segovia and Mary A Tolbert), Minneapolis: Fortress Press, pp. 109–118.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).