Hagar and Epistemic Injustice: An Intercultural and Post-colonial Analysis of Genesis 16
Front Cover of Old Testament Essays, Volume 34, Issue 2, 2021
PDF

Keywords

Genesis 16
Hagar
Epistemic injustice
Miranda Fricker
David Tuesday Adamo
African Biblical Hermeneutics
Intercultural and Post-colonial Criticism

How to Cite

Elness-Hanson, B. (2021). Hagar and Epistemic Injustice: An Intercultural and Post-colonial Analysis of Genesis 16. Old Testament Essays, 34(2), 445–459. Retrieved from https://ote-journal.otwsa-otssa.org.za/index.php/journal/article/view/464

Abstract

Having one’s voice heard and being known by one’s name are foundational aspects of respect and human dignity. Likewise, being able to contribute to shared understanding is at the core of epistemic justice. This intercultural and post-colonial inquiry of Gen 16 considers the Egyptian Hagar—known by her foreign Semitic name meaning “Fleeing One”—as an example of epistemic injustice. Integrating Miranda Fricker’s work on epistemic injustice, this study espouses the justice of hearing and seeing the marginalised and oppressed, as exemplified by Yhwh. As the Egyptian woman’s voice—once ignored—gives testimony within the text to a fuller understanding of God, so also listening to/seeing other contemporary African scholars’ voices/writings opens one’s ears/eyes to fuller understandings of God today. These voices include the seminal work of David Tuesday Adamo, a vanguard in African biblical hermeneutics, in whose honour this examination is written.

 

https://doi.org/10.17159/2312-3621/2021/v34n2a8

PDF

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).