Allegorising song of song's most erotic parts: Judaism, Calvinism, Lutheranism.

  • Eben Scheffler UNISA
Keywords: Song of songs, erotic, allegorism, Judaism, Calvinism, Lutheranism,

Abstract

The contemporary debate regarding the neo-allegorical Song of Songs interpretation focuses more on its legitimacy than how it is done. If allegorical interpretation promotes uncontrollable subjective interpretation, this would especially surface when different religious traditions are involved. Moreover, if allegorical interpretation is done to avoid dealing with explicit sexuality in the Song, comparing texts from three diverse religious traditions on the more erotic parts of the Song has the potential to provide insight not only in the method of allegory but also in the contextuality and subjectivity of interpretation as such. The paper discusses examples from the Targum, the Calvinistic Dutch Statenbijbel and Luther’s lectures on Canticles.


https://doi.org/10.17159/2312-3621/2018/v31n3a19

References

Carr, D. The erotic word: Sexuality, Spirituality and the Bible. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.

Catholic Truth Society. The CTS New Catholic Bible. London: The Incorporated Catholic Truth Society, 2007.

Exum, J.C. Song of Songs: A Commentary (OTL: London: SCM. 2005).

Fischer, S. Das Hohelied Salomos zwischen Poesie und Erzählung. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1628/978-3-16-151113-4

Gerleman, G. Ruth, Das Hohelied (Neukirchen: Neukirchener Verlag. 1965).

Holman, Jan. 1997. ‘Pleidooi voor een onderaards Hooglied: Resultaten van een cultureel-antropologische lazing.’ Tijdschrift voor Theologie 37:113-131.

Keel, O.The Song of Songs: a continental commentary. Transated by F.J. Gaiser. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1994.

Küng, H. 1994. Grosse christliche Denker München: Piper Verlag).

Lamparter, H. Das Buch der Sehnsucht: Ruth, Hoheslied, Klagelieder. Stuttgart: Calwer Verlag 1962.

Landy, F. Paradoxes of paradise: Identity and difference in the Song of Songs. 2nd ed.; Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix Press, 2011.

Loader, J A. 2001. ‘Exegetical erotica to Canticles 7:2–6’, Journal for Semitics, 10: 98-111.

Luther, Martin. [1539] 1972 Notes on Ecclesiastes. Lectures on the Song of Solomon. Treatise on the last words of David. Edited by Jaroslav Pelikan. Luther’s Works Vol. 15; Saint Louis: Concordia Publishing.

Melamed, Raphael Hai. 1919-1922. ‘The Targum to Canticles According to Six Yemen Mss. Compared with the “Textus Receptus” (Ed. de Lagarde)’, Jewish Quarterly Review, New Series, 10 (1919-20): 377-410, 11 (1920-21): 1-20, and 12 (1921-22): 57-117.

Müller, H.-P. “Das Hohelied.” Pages 1-90 in Das Hohelied/Klagelieder/Das Buch Ester. Edited by H.-P. Müller, O. Kaiser, & J.A. Loader. 4th ed. ATD 16/2. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 1992.

Pope, Marvin H. Song of Songs: A New Translation and Commentary. The Anchor Bible 7C. New York: Doubleday & Company, 1977.

Ringgren, H.. ‘Das Hohelied.’ Pages 253-292 in Das Hohelied/Klage¬lieder/Das Buch Ester. Edited by Ringgren, H. & Kaiser, O. 3rd edition ATD 16/2. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1981.

Rudolph, W. Das Buch Ruth, Das Hohelied, Die Klagelieder. KAT 17. Gütersloh: Gerd Mohn, 1962.

Schwienhorst-Schönenberger, L. Das Hohelied der Liebe. Freiburg: Herder, 2015.

Statenbijbel. 1637.

Staten-Generaal van de Vereenigde Nederlande

Bijbel, dat is de gansche Heilige Schrift bevattende al de canonieke boeken des Ouden en Nieuwen Testaments (Anoniem: Statenbijbel). Leiden: A.W. Sijthoff.

Targum to Song of Songs. 2018. Trans. J.C. Treat. Assessed on 21 July 2018; https://www.sas.upenn.edu~jtreat/song/targum/

Zenger, E. et al. (eds.). Einleitung in das Alte Testament. 3rd ed. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1998.

______ Einleitung in das Alte Testament. 9th updated ed.; Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 2016).

Published
2019-01-31