2 Samuel 21-24: A Theological Reflection on Israel’s Kingship
The chiastic arrangement of 2 Sam 21-24 signifies that it is not just a collection of miscellaneous material supplementing the Samuel corpus. Rather it is intentionally arranged so as to function as a theological reflection on Israel’s kingship. This paper shows that the three pairs of literary elements, namely, the two narratives (2 Sam 21:1-14; 24:1-25); the two lists of warriors (21:15-22; 23:8-39); and the two poems (22:1-51; 23:1-7), demonstrate divine responses to Israel’s request for a king. Despite his displeasure of their request, God grants Israel their wish and installs kings for them. The two narratives show the failure of human kingship that brings calamity to the people. The warrior lists are the manifestations of God’s providence in giving them fighters. The two poems reveal divine election of David as his messiah and that Israel’s ideal kingship should be under the governance and supremacy of their divine King, Yahweh.
Adler, Joshua J. “David’s Last Sin: Was It the Census?” Jewish Bible Quarterly 23
Albright, William Foxwell. “The Oracles of Balaam.” Journal of Biblical Literature 63
Auld, A Graeme. “A Factored Response to An Enigma.” In For and Against David: Story
and History In the Books of Samuel. Edited by A. Graeme Auld and Erik Eynikel.
-66. Leuven: Peeters, 2010.
Bailey, Randall C. “the Redemption of Yahweh: A Literary Critical Function of the
Songs of Hannah and David.” Biblical Interpretation 3 (1995): 213-231.
Bergen, Robert D. 1, 2 Samuel, The New American Commentary. Nashville: Broadman
& Holman, 1996.
Brueggemann, Walter. “2 Samuel 21-24: An Appendix of Deconstruction?” Catholic
Biblical Quarterly 50 (1988): 383-97.
Carlson, R. A. David, the Chosen King: A Traditio-historical Approach to the Second
Book of Samuel. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell, 1964.
Campbell, Antony F. “2 Samuel 21-24: The Enigma Factor.” In For and Against David:
Story and History in the Books of Samuel. Edited by A. Graeme Auld and Erik
Eynikel. 347-58. Leuven: Peeters, 2010.
Cartledge, Tony W. 1 & 2 Samuel. Smyth & Helwys Bible Commentary. Macon: Smyth
& Helwys, 2001.
Childs, Brevard S. Introduction to the Old Testament as Scripture. Philadelphia: Fortress,
Chisholm, Robert B. Jr. 1 & 2 Samuel. Teach the Text Commentary Series. Grand Rapids:
________. “Does God Deceive?” Bibliotheca Sacra 155 (1998): 11-28.
Douglas, Mary. “Reading Numbers after Samuel.” In Reflection and Refraction: Studies
in Biblical Historiography in Honour of A. Graeme Auld. Edited by Timothy H.
Lim, Robert Rezetko, and W. Brian Aucker. 139-153. Leiden: Brill, 2007.
Exum, J. Cheryl and J. William Whedbee. “Isaac, Samson, and Saul: Reflections on the
Comic and Tragic Visions.” Semeia 32 (1984): 5-40.
Firth, David G. 1 & 2 Samuel. Apollos Old Testament Commentary. Downers Grove:
Inter Varsity, 2009.
________. Review of II Samuel 21-24: Context, Structure, and Meaning in the Samuel
Conclusion, by Herbert H. Klement. Old Testament Essays 15 (2002): 831-33.
Fokkelman, J. P. Narrative Art and Poetry in the Books of Samuel: A Full Interpretation
Based on Stylistic and Structural Analysis. Vol. III Throne and City: II Samuel 2-
and 21-24. Assen: Van Gorcum, 1990.
George, Mark K. “YHWH’s Own Heart.” Catholic Biblical Quarterly 64 (2002): 442-59.
Gunn, David M. The Story of King David: Genre and Interpretation. Journal for the
Study of the Old Testament Supplement Series 6. Sheffield: JSOT Press, 1978.
________. The Fate of King Saul: An Interpretation of a Biblical Story. Journal for the
Study of the Old Testament Supplement Series 15. Sheffield: JSOT Press, 1980.
Klement, Herbert H. “Structure, Context and Meaning in the Samuel Conclusion (2 Sa.
-24)” Tyndale Bulletin 47 (1996): 367-70.
Long, V. Philip. The Reign and Rejection of King Saul: A Case for Literary and
Theological Coherence. SBL Dissertation Series 118. Atlanta: Scholars Press,
McCarter, P. Kyle Jr. II Samuel: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary.
Anchor Bible 9. Garden City: Doubleday, 1984.
Park, Song-Mi Suzie. “Census and Censure: Sacred Threshing Floors and Counting
Taboos in 2 Samuel 24.” Horizons in Biblical Theology 35 (2013): 21-41.
Polzin, Robert. Samuel and the Deuteronomist: A Literary Study of the Deuteronomic
History: 1 Samuel. San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1989.
________. David and the Deuteronomist: A Study of the Deuteronomic Histroy: Part 3: 2
Samuel. Indiana: Indiana University Press, 1993.
Pritchard, James B. The Ancient Near East: An Anthology of Texts and Pictures.
Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1958.
Provan I., V. P. Long, and T. Longman III. A Biblical History of Israel. Louisville:
Westminster John Knox Press, 2003.
Satterthwaite, Philip E. “David in the Book of Samuel: A Messianic Hope?” In The
Lord’s Anointed:Interpretation of Old Testament Messianic Texts. Edited by
Philip E. Satterthwaite, Richard S. Hess, and Gordon J. Wenham. Grand Rapids:
Sellars, Dawn Maria. “An Obedient Servant? The Reign of King Saul (1 Samuel 13-15)
Reassessed.” Journal for the Study of the Old Testament 35 (2011): 317-38.
Sheppard, Gerald. Wisdom as a Hermeneutical Construct: A Study in the Sapientializing
of the Old Testament. Berlin, New York: de Gruyter, 1980.
Wolters, Albert M. “The Balaamites of Deir ‘Alla as Aramean Deportees.” Hebrew
Union College Annual 59 (1988): 101-13.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).