Figuring out Cain. Darwin, Spangenberg and Cormon
AbstractThis essay responds to a question Prof. I.J.J. (Sakkie) Spangenberg asked the author at the 2015 meeting of the OTSSA with regard to the use of the Old Testament in current South African discourse, that is, why is the figure of Cain used to illustrate perpetrator discourse? The author argues that the figure of Cain draws attention to the responsibility of South African whiteness towards apartheid and its after effects and explores the respons(e)-ability of ordinary (white) bible readers in this regard. There are good reasons or warrants for focusing on Cain as perpetrator by accepting or adhering to the advice fostered firstly by post-Holocaust hermeneutics in Germany and secondly by archetypal criticism of myths in the cultural archive. In framing this responsibility and respons(e)-ability, firstly a leaf is taken from the German socio-political and religious discourse after the Holocaust. Secondly, the value of Cain as archetype in the cultural archive will be discussed. Thirdly, Fernan Cormon’s painting, Cain (1880) as part of the cultural archive will be analyzed as a heuristic key to interrogate evil.
Snyman, Gerrie F. “A Hermeneutic of Vulnerability: Redeeming Cain?” Stellenbosch Theological Journal 1, no. 2 (2015): 633–665. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.17570/stj.2015.v1n2.a30.
———. “Collective Memory and Coloniality of Being as a Hermeneutical Framework: A Partialised Reading of Ezra-Nehemiah.” Old Testament Essays 20, no. 1 (2007): 53–83.
———. Om die Bybel anders te Lees. ’n Etiek van Bybellees. Pretoria: Griffel-Media, 2007.
———. “The Old Testament: An Absurd Fossil Oor a Pool in the Great Sea of Stories?” In Old Testament Science and Reality. A Mosaic for Deist, edited by Willie Wessels and Eben Scheffler, 70–88. Pretoria: Verba Vitae, 1992.
———. “‘Tis a Vice to Know Him’. Readers’ Response Ability and Responsibility in 2 Chronicles 14 16.” In Bible and Ethics of Reading, edited by Danna Nolan Fewell and Gary A. Phillips, 77:91–114. Semeia. Atlanta, USA: Society of Biblical Literature, 1997.
———. “Totius: Die Ironie van Vergewe En Vergeet.” LitNet Akademies (Godsdienswetenskappe) 12, no. 2 (2015). http://www.litnet.co.za/totius-die-ironie-van-vergewe-en-vergeet/.
———. “Cain and Vulnerability: The Reception of Cain in Genesis Rabbah 22 and Targum Onkelos, Targum Neofiti and Targum Pseudo-Jonathan.” Old Testament Essays 29, no. 3 (2016a): 601–32.
About, Edmund. “Salon de 1880 , May 1880: 18-19.” Le XIX Siècle, May 1880, 18–19.
Arendt, Hannah. Eichmann in Jerusalem. A Report on the Banality of Evil. New York: The Viking Press, 1963.
———. On Revolution. London: Faber & Faber, 1963.
———. The Life of the Mind Vol. 1. Thinking (London: Secker & Warburg, 1978. Vol. 1: Thinking. London: Secker & Warburg, 1978.
Bouma, Mieke. De 12 Oerkarakters van Storytelling. Archetypes En Hun Basisplots. Antwerpen: Atlas Contact, 2016.
Byron, John. Cain and Abel in Text and Tradition: Jewish and Christian Interpretations of the First Sibling Rivalry. Themes in Biblical Narrative Jewish and Christian Traditions 14. Leiden: Brill, 2011.
Campbell, Joseph. A Hero with a Thousand Faces. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1972.
De Vleminck, Jens. “‘In the Beginning Was the Deed.’ On Oedipus and Cain.” In Classical Myth and Psychoanalysis: Ancient and Modern Stories of the Self, edited by Vanda Zajko and Ellen O’Gorman, 265–82. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
———. “Oedipus and Cain: Brothers in Arms.” International Forum of Psychoanalysis 19 (2010): 172–84.
Fisher, Walter. Human Communication as Narration: Toward a Philosophy of Reason, Value, and Action. Columbia, S.C.: University of South Carolina Press, 1987.
Gregg, Robert C. “Cain and Abel/Qabil and Habil.” In Shared Stories, Rival Tellings. Early Encounters of Jews, Christians, and Muslims, 1–113. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.
———. Shared Stories, Rival Tellings. Early Encounters of Jews, Christians, and Muslims. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.
Hales, William. A New Analysis of Chronology and Geography, History and Prophecy: Their Elements Are Attempted to Be Explained, Harmonized, and Vindicated, upon Scriptural and Scientific Principles; Tending to Remove the Imperfection and Discordance of Preceding Systems, and to Obviate the Cavils of Sceptics, Jews, and Infidels. 2nd ed. Vol. 2. 4 vols. London: C.J.G. and F. Rivington, 1830.
Havet, Isabelle. “Fernand Cormon’s Cain: Man between Primitive and Prophet.” In Picturing Evolution and Extinction: Art and Science in Republican France, edited by Fae Brauer and Serena Keshavjee, 19–40. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishers, 2016.
Jung, Carl G. The Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious. Translated by Richard F.C. Hull. London: Routledge, 1968.
Keegan, Michael. “The Banality of Evil: Lessons From South African Apartheid.” The Huffington Post, December 12, 2013. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-b-keegan/-the-banality-of-evil-les_b_4432898.html.
Lucy, Martha. “Cormon’s ‘Cain’ and the Problem of the Prehistoric Body.” Oxford Art Journal 25, no. 2 (2002): 109–26.
Mcentire, Mark. “Cain and Abel in Africa. An Ethiopian Case Study in Competing Hermeneutics.” In The Bible in Africa. Transactions, Trajectories and Trends, edited by Gerald O. West and Musa W. Dube, 248–59. Leiden: Brill, 2000.
Miller, Stephen. “Stephen Miller, ‘A Note on the Banality of Evil,’ The Wilson Quarterly 22/4 (1998).” The Wislon Quarterley 22, no. 4 (1998): 55.
Mosala, Itumeleng. Biblical Hermeneutics and Black Theology in South Africa. Grand Rapids: Eerdmams, 1989.
Oluo, Ojeoma. “White People: I Don’t Want You To Understand Me Better, I Want You To Understand Yourselves.” The Establishment, February 7, 2017. https://theestablishment.co/white-people-i-dont-want-you-to-understand-me-better-i-want-you-to-understand-yourselves-a6fbedd42ddf#.sot38mql8.
Perkinson, James W. White Theology. Outing Supremacy in Modernity. New York: Palgrave, 2004.
Schüssler Fiorenza, Elizabeth. “The Ethics of Biblical Interpretation: Decentering Biblical Scholarship.” Journal of Bib Lical Literature 107, no. 1 (1988): 3–17.
Spangenberg, Sakkie (I.J.J.). “Die Tradisionele Christelike Godsdiens en Teologie in die Greep van ’n Verouderde Paradigma: Diagnose En Prognose.” LitNet Akademies (Godsdienswetenskappe) 10, no. 2 (2013). http://www.litnet.co.za/die-tradisionele-christelike-godsdiens-en-teologie-in-die-greep-van-n-verouderde-paradigma/.
———. “Die ‘vergroening’ van die Christelike Godsdiens: Charles Darwin, Pierre Teilhard de Chardin en Lloyd Geering.” HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies 70, no. 1 (2014): Art. #2712, 9 pages. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/ hts.v70i1.2712.
———. “Kollig Op Genesis 1-3: Verslag van Verskuiwende Denke En Geloof.” Old Testament Essays 27, no. 2 (2014): 612–636.
———. “On the Origin of Death: Paul and Augustine Meet Charles Darwin.” HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies 69, no. 1 (2013): Art. #1992, 8 pages. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/ hts.v69i1.1992.
———. “Ses Dekades Ou Testamentteologie (1952–2012): Van Één Spreker Tot Verskeie Menslike Sprekers.” HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies 68, no. 1 (2012): Art. #1273. 9 pages. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/ hts.v68i1.1273.
Szondi, Lipót (Leopoldt). Kain. Gestalten Des Bösen, Bern: Hans Huber, 1969. Bern: Hans Huber, 1969.
Szondi, Lipót (Leopoldt), and Claude Van Reeth. “Thanatos et Caïn. Au Commencement de La Culture 68/99 (1970) : 373-384. Doi :” Revue Philosophique de Louvain 68, no. 99 (1970): 373–84. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3406/phlou.1970.5562.
Vetlesen, Arne J. “Hannah Arendt on Conscience and Evil.” Philosophy & Social Criticism 27, no. 7 (2001): 1–33.
Von Kellenbach, Katharina. The Mark of Cain: Guilt and Denial in the Post-War Lives of Nazi Perpetrators. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
Wekker, Gloria. White Innocence. Paradoxes of Colonialism and Race. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2016.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).